Also, Recap may be a better method if you are trying to scan black and/or reflective objects without priming them with powder.īoth of these mesh objects are coming straight from their respective 3D capture programs prior to clean-up. Both options allow you to capture the color/texture map of the objects and it seems as though the Recap method is more successful in this regard. You are also required to wait for the Recap system to generate your mesh, which is an undetermined amount of time. The downsides are a lower quality and a scaleless result. Autodesk Recap offers a simpler solution that involves taking a series of photographs around a fixed object and then uploading them to the online system. These scans will generally also need to be cleaned up in a another software such as Geomagic Studio.
The benefits of the David Scanner are a higher resolution and accurate scale, however there is significant setup, scanning, and alignment time. Photogrammetry works on the principle of stereo image pair, hence for triangulation to work the position of the camera must be different.
This tutorial focuses on the David Scanner, but the Autodesk Recap application may be better suited for your circumstances depending on the desired outcome. Recap Pro Photogrammetry Software by Autodesk See whos skilled in this Add as skill Learn more About Use ReCap Pro reality capture software for 3D models from photographs and laser scans. The following set of images compare a mesh object scanned with the David Laserscanner, and the same object captured using Autodesk Recap 360(photogrammetry method). I believe this depth of imagery comes from something called photogrammetry, which according to the Microsoft News Center is taking the original satellite.
0 kommentar(er)
